Skip to main content

Student Syndrome, Parkinson's Law, Self-Protection, and Sandbagging

Facing challenges like Student Syndrome, Parkinson's Law, Self-Protection, and Sandbagging in our team? 

🚀 Here's a quick quality check on these issues:

1️⃣ Student Syndrome (Planned Procrastination): You or the team delay doing project activities until right before the deadline. This name came about due to the typical behavior of a student who delays studying until the last days before exams. When a project starts, team members often start off casually, intensifying their efforts as the project deadline approaches. It is because people keep postponing important tasks until they become urgent. This often results in a less than satisfactory outcome due to a lack of time and focus. Contingency is wasted, and risk is increased and puts the team under stress and pressure.

2️⃣ Parkinson's Law (Time Expansion): People allow work to expand to fill the time allotted. For eg: if you assign a task at 9 am and ask someone to submit it by 6 pm, they might take the full 9 to 6 (9 hours) to do the work when the actual effort required is only 2 hours. In project, this means that people will spend all of the time allocated to complete a task, regardless of how long it actually takes. This can lead to inefficient use of time and resources and can cause delays. This law is often cited as a reason why projects tend to take longer than expected, and why deadlines are often missed.

3️⃣ Self-Protection (Task or Conflict Avoidance): People protect themselves in tasks or conflicts by saying things that would not hurt them now or in the future. For eg: not completing work on time or with quality, fearing that management will demand the same standards in the future. This occurs due to the tendency of individuals to protect their sense of identity and self-worth in a team or organizational setting. This can manifest as self-justification and a reluctance to cooperate with others, which can lead to conflict and a loss of team performance.

4️⃣ Sandbagging (Padding Estimates): This is a phenomenon where teams or individuals intentionally inflate their estimates or timelines for completing a project or task, anticipating that their estimates will be ignored or reduced. Sometimes, the team practices holding complete work until the true due date arrives. Sandbagging can result in a lack of trust and communication within a team and lead to unrealistic expectations, delays, and budget overruns. It can also lead to a lack of accountability, transparency, and ownership within a team, as individuals may not feel motivated to complete tasks on time or to the best of their ability. It can also damage trust and credibility between team members and stakeholders as well.

🌟 Recognizing and addressing these challenges is key to fostering a high-performing and transparent team culture. Let's strive for open communication, realistic planning, and a culture of accountability!

Popular posts from this blog

Agile Transformation - A Comprehensive Guide to Successful Transition Strategies in Business Practices

In today's fast-paced business landscape, the adoption of Agile methodologies has become a highly sought-after strategy for enhancing productivity and accelerating product delivery. However, transitioning from traditional, Waterfall project management to Agile practices can be challenging, given potential obstacles such as skill gaps and resistance to change. To successfully embrace Agile, a strategic approach is essential, involving careful preparation and execution. In this article, we will explore key strategies for a successful transition to Agile, emphasizing the importance of adopting the Agile mindset, redefining roles, and responsibilities, embracing a whole-team approach, continuous testing, flexibility, open communication, feedback, and the involvement of both management and the team. Embrace the Agile Mindset: Agile is more than just a process; it's a cultural revolution. To succeed, teams must fully embrace the Agile mindset, characterized by collaboration, openne

Why do we need a Project Manager when we have this awesome project management software

Ever think, "𝐔𝐠𝐡, 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐝𝐨 𝐰𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐰𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐞?" 🤔 Hold on a second! 🛑 Software's great for keeping track of tasks. But let's be real, it can't replace the human magic of a good Project Manager! ✨ Project Managers aren't just button-pushers; they're the glue holding everything together. Sure, the software can keep track of tasks, but can it charm stakeholders or turn a mess into a masterpiece? I doubt it. 💼 Project management involves tasks like defining clear project goals, aligning strategies, managing risks, and regularly checking progress, let's think of them as the fireplace to your project's living room: 🔥 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐤: Setting goals, aligning everyone, and managing expectations (like arranging the logs). 🔥 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐮𝐳𝐳𝐲: Empowering your t

Are overly positive about how much you can finish in a day? - Learn about Pomodoro Technique

Let's think about tomatoes instead of hours. Sounds funny? Millions of individuals have fervently endorsed the 𝗣𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗿𝗼 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲, praising its remarkable capacity to revolutionize their productivity and lifestyle. (𝗣𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗿𝗼 means 𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗼 in Italian. 🍅) This well-liked time management approach suggests you switch between pomodoros - concentrated work sessions - and short breaks often to keep up focus and avoid mental tiredness. Francesco Cirillo, a student, developed the Pomodoro Technique in the late 1980s. He was having trouble focusing on his studies and finishing tasks. Feeling overwhelmed, he challenged himself to just 10 minutes of focused study time. Motivated by the challenge, he found a tomato shaped kitchen timer, and that's how the technique started. 1️⃣ 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗮 𝘁𝗼-𝗱𝗼 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗮 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿. 2️⃣ 𝗦𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝟮𝟱 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘂𝘁𝗲𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸 𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲

Agile Manifesto - An Interpretation

As we know, Manifesto for Agile Software Development cites. We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value: Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Working software over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a plan That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more. Agile techniques place a high focus on cooperation, collaboration, and excellent communication between those involved in the software development process. Although protocols and technologies are required, the emphasis is on enabling people to collaborate effectively. So people makes an impact, not the process and tools used, a simple white board is enough if we have a great team, right? Agile development approaches place a higher priority on producing functional, usable software than lengthy documentation. The f

Is Scrum better than FDD (Feature-Driven Development)?

FDD is a customer-centric software development methodology that is known for its short iterations and frequent releases. Like Scrum, FDD places the customer, referred to as the project business owner, at the center of the process, requiring their input in the initial design meeting and iteration retrospectives. By prioritizing client requests and responding promptly to their needs, developers ensure client satisfaction through an incremental approach to feature releases. To accomplish this, developers identify feasible features, break down complex requirements into smaller sets of features, and devise a plan to achieve each objective over time. Jeff De Luca and Peter Coad developed FDD while working on a banking project in Singapore in 1997. The FDD process comprises five key steps. First, the chief architect or project leader defines the system's scope and context to establish the overall model. One way to effectively use Feature-Driven Development (FDD) is to generate a list of